The best online Debate website - DebateIsland.com! The only Online Debate Website with Casual, Persuade Me, Formalish, and Formal Online Debate formats. We’re the Leading Online Debate website. Debate popular topics, Debate news, or Debate anything! Debate online for free!
Should taxpayers be forced to fund some woman's abortion? in Politics
For neutrality's sake, I will only comment in the comment section?
Revelation 3:10 Because thou hast kept the word of my patience, I also will keep thee from the hour of temptation, which shall come upon all the world, to try them that dwell upon the earth.
As any other elective surgery it should be properly subsidized and controlled and so should undergo the scrutiny. Also services should always be offered equally to people without the rationale or economic viability to participate.
Nobody should be "forced" to do anything in a free society. If one wants to fund someone else's abortion procedure, they can always directly donate to that person, or to a charity that will spend the money accordingly. And if not, then, moral or not, it is their right to spend their money on themselves or on someone else they want to spend their money on.
Nobody should be "forced" to do anything in a free society. If one wants to fund someone else's abortion procedure, they can always directly donate to that person, or to a charity that will spend the money accordingly. And if not, then, moral or not, it is their right to spend their money on themselves or on someone else they want to spend their money on.
Revelation 3:10 Because thou hast kept the word of my patience, I also will keep thee from the hour of temptation, which shall come upon all the world, to try them that dwell upon the earth.
Nobody should be "forced" to do anything in a free society. If one wants to fund someone else's abortion procedure, they can always directly donate to that person, or to a charity that will spend the money accordingly. And if not, then, moral or not, it is their right to spend their money on themselves or on someone else they want to spend their money on.
what about being forced to not kill is that ok That is a good point. I saw the pictures, and I am prolife.
Revelation 3:10 Because thou hast kept the word of my patience, I also will keep thee from the hour of temptation, which shall come upon all the world, to try them that dwell upon the earth.
@DarrickJohnston No. I have the Christian right to not pay for that which goes against my religion.
Revelation 3:10 Because thou hast kept the word of my patience, I also will keep thee from the hour of temptation, which shall come upon all the world, to try them that dwell upon the earth.
The constitutional issue in this question is that a
misrepresentation of a admission of guilt placed in a united state with the
democratic public is used to ignore the other
crimes that are going on that are not admitted and are simple harder to prove.
The cost and burden of proof does not mean at some time in the future these crimes
cannot be enforced by law and cost the public a civil Right, their constitutional
right to vote.
Tax funding will undoubtable need to be directed at some point
to the judicial separation process that should have been occurring on any
admission of guilt on a known felony. Also it should be noted that science has
been performing abortion with taxation funding. As In Vitro fertilization research
is linked directly to abortion as a process it simple removes the woman from any
control fertilization of an egg.
As a common defense to a general welfare at this point the description of female specific amputation would be an address to Constitutional privacy issue describe by Roe vs Wade
Arguments
  Considerate: 97%  
  Substantial: 4%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 0.74  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 95%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 89%  
  Substantial: 80%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.82  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 53%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 89%  
  Substantial: 93%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.1  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 84%  
  Substantial: 85%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.2  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 92%  
  Substantial: 11%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 50%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.16  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 87%  
  Substantial: 90%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.84  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 79%  
  Substantial: 34%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.22  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 90%  
  Learn More About Debra
The phrase "forced to not kill" makes no sense, because not killing does not constitute an action.
  Considerate: 87%  
  Substantial: 54%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 83%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.46  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
The constitutional issue in this question is that a misrepresentation of a admission of guilt placed in a united state with the democratic public is used to ignore the other crimes that are going on that are not admitted and are simple harder to prove. The cost and burden of proof does not mean at some time in the future these crimes cannot be enforced by law and cost the public a civil Right, their constitutional right to vote.
Tax funding will undoubtable need to be directed at some point to the judicial separation process that should have been occurring on any admission of guilt on a known felony. Also it should be noted that science has been performing abortion with taxation funding. As In Vitro fertilization research is linked directly to abortion as a process it simple removes the woman from any control fertilization of an egg.
As a common defense to a general welfare at this point the description of female specific amputation would be an address to Constitutional privacy issue describe by Roe vs Wade
  Considerate: 84%  
  Substantial: 95%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.18  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 81%  
  Learn More About Debra